Fact-check
Is Liv.52 banned in India?
Last checked 10 October 2026
Liv.52 is not banned: no ban, recall, failed lab test or regulator notice naming Liv.52 or Himalaya Wellness is on record in the Maharashtra FDA table of 9 Oct 2026, the CDSCO Ayush page or the US FDA import alerts for India.
- Classification
- Not banned; no action on record
- Tested by
- No regulator action on record
- Reference
- Sources checked: Maharashtra FDA NSQ table (9 Oct 2026); CDSCO Ayush division page; US FDA import alerts, India list (9 Oct 2026)
- Latest action
- 10 October 2026
- Last checked
- 10 October 2026
Photo: Ayurvedic herbs 02.jpg by Vis M (CC BY-SA 4.0). All photo credits.
Maharashtra FDA: not of standard quality (NSQ) alerts table
No regulator has acted on this finding. It comes from a published study or a private testing company, and the brand may dispute it.
Scope. A record here does not by itself mean a product or company is unsafe or banned today. Regulatory actions can apply to one batch, one formulation, one period or one state. Always check the linked government document for the current position, and tell us if something is out of date. How we label records.
Below: Blacklisted's explanationWe explain what the test or study found. No regulator has acted on it.
Key facts
- Status
- Not banned; no action on record
- Maharashtra FDA table
- Checked as of 9 Oct 2026: the named ayurvedic findings relate to other makers and products
- CDSCO Ayush division
- Its page lists mostly WHO-GMP certificate lists; no Liv.52 notice
- US FDA import alerts
- No Himalaya entry among the Indian entries read
Where the claim comes from
Searches ask whether Liv.52 is 'banned' or 'harmful'. We found no regulator document behind either claim.
Liv.52 is not banned in India. We checked three official sources: Maharashtra FDA's table of products that failed state lab tests (as of 9 Oct 2026), the CDSCO Ayush division page, and the US FDA import alerts that list Indian firms (updated 9 Oct 2026). None names Liv.52 or its maker, Himalaya Wellness.
A ban, a failed batch or a licence action would normally appear in one of those places or in a state order. We found none. That is not a certificate of quality: it means no regulator action is on record in the sources we read.
What this means for you
Absence is not endorsement
Nothing on record means no regulator action in the sources we checked. We do not assess whether any medicine suits a person, and a doctor should advise on liver conditions.
How a real problem would show up
A failed test would appear as a named batch in a state NSQ table, and a licence action as a state order. Neither names Liv.52 today.
This is a record of official orders, not medical advice. Do not stop a prescribed medicine without asking your doctor or pharmacist.
Common questions
Is Liv.52 harmful?
No regulator finding on Liv.52 is on record in the sources we checked. We do not give clinical advice; ask a doctor about use in any liver condition.
Official sources and primary records
- Maharashtra FDA: not of standard quality (NSQ) alerts tableRegulatorMaharashtra Food and Drug Administration · 9 October 2026
- Regulator
- US FDA import alerts: entries for IndiaRegulatorUS Food and Drug Administration · 9 October 2026