Product record
Vip Hair Colour Shampoo: batches declared Not of Standard Quality
Last checked 3 November 2026. Source: CDSCO monthly NSQ alerts, Jan 2019 to Sep 2026
7 batches of products named "Vip Hair Colour Shampoo" (as printed by the testing lab) failed a CDSCO or state drug-testing laboratory test between November 2024 and January 2025. This is a record of specific batches, it does not mean the molecule or every brand is unsafe.
Records by type
7 records linked to Vip Hair Colour Shampoo in the datasets we hold. A zero means nothing is on record in those datasets, not that nothing ever happened. What the labels mean.
CDSCO drug alerts: Not of Standard Quality and spurious drugs
Scope. A failed batch is not a verdict on every pack of this product. Regulatory actions can apply to one batch, one formulation, one period or one state. Always check the linked government document for the current position, and tell us if something is out of date. How we label records.
Flagged batches
| Batch | Manufacturer | Reason declared NSQ | Tested by | Alert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batch B107CMfg Jun 2024 · Exp May 2026 | VimacTamil Nadu | Sample does not conform to BIS specification for oxidation hair dye with respect to the content of phenyl methyl pyrazolone and ResorcinolOther | DTL ChennaiState lab | Jan 2025 |
| Batch B320CMfg Mar 2024 · Exp Feb 2026 | VimacTamil Nadu | 1.Sample does not conform to BIS Specification for Oxidation Hair dye with respect to the content of Resorcinol and Phenyl Methyl Pyrazolone. 2. The sample is also found to contain m- phenylenediamine which must not form part of the composition of cosmetics products as per BIS specification 4707 (Part 2):2017, under Annex A (clauses 1,2 and 3.1), Serial No.1198.Other | DTL ChennaiState lab | Nov 2024 |
| Batch B309CMfg Feb 2024 · Exp Jan 2026 | VimacTamil Nadu | 1.Sample does not conform to BIS Specification for oxidation hair dye with respect to the content of resorcinol and phenyl methyl pyrazolone. 2. The sample is also found to contain m- phenylenediamine which must not form part of the composition of cosmetics products as per BIS specification 4707 (Part 2):2017, under Annex A (clauses 1,2 and 3.1), Serial No.1198.Other | DTL ChennaiState lab | Nov 2024 |
| Batch B034KERLMfg Apr 2024 · Exp Mar 2026 | VimacTamil Nadu | 1.Sample does not conform to BIS specificaton for oxidation hair dye with respect to the content of phenymehylpyrazolone.Other | DTL ChennaiState lab | Nov 2024 |
| Batch B034KERLMfg Apr 2024 · Exp Mar 2026 | VimacTamil Nadu | Sample does not conform to BIS specificiation for oxidation hair dye with respect to the content of phenyl methyl pyrazolone.Other | DTL ChennaiState lab | Nov 2024 |
| Batch BO53KTKMfg May 2024 · Exp Apr 2026 | VimacTamil Nadu | 1.Sample does not conform to BIS Specification for oxidation hair dye with respect to the content of resorcinol and phenyl methyl pyrazolone. 2.The sample is also found to contain m- phenylenediamine which must not form part of the composition of cosmetics products as per BIS specification 4707 (Part 2):2017, under Annex A (clauses 1,2 and 3.1), Serial No.1198.Other | DTL ChennaiState lab | Nov 2024 |
| Batch B020CMfg Apr 2024 · Exp Mar 2026 | VimacTamil Nadu | Sample does not conform to BIS specification for oxidation hair dye with respect to the content of resorcinol and phenyl methyl pyrazolone.Other | DTL ChennaiState lab | Nov 2024 |
How to use this. Match the batch number on your strip or bottle against the list. If your batch is listed, return it to the pharmacy and ask for a replacement; if not, the product is not on any alert as of September 2026. Check any batch number.